454
56
65
Based on our detailed research and customer feedback, Quickassignment does not meet the quality standards expected from a reliable writing service. Customers have reported plagiarised work, missed deadlines, and poor writing from non-native English speakers. We rate Quickassignment 1 out of 5 and do not recommend it for academic or professional writing needs.
While Quickassignment advertises a refund policy, customers frequently report that obtaining a refund is difficult. The process is slow and often unsuccessful. Recovering fees for substandard work is rare and most users cannot successfully claim refunds even when work is clearly unsatisfactory.
Customer reviews of Quickassignment are overwhelmingly negative. Common complaints include plagiarised content, writing produced by non-native English speakers, missed deadlines, poor grammar and sentence structure, and unresponsive or unhelpful customer support when issues arise with assignments.
No. We strongly advise against using Quickassignment for dissertations, theses, or any high-stakes academic work. The pattern of plagiarism, missed deadlines, and poor writing quality makes Quickassignment unsuitable for important projects where originality and timely delivery are essential to success.
For trustworthy UK academic writing services, check the top-rated options on the UKRankings homepage. Each recommended service is vetted on quality of writing, delivery reliability, transparent pricing, and customer support, so you avoid the issues seen with services like Quickassignment.
Quickassignment markets itself on affordable prices aimed at UK students, but headline figures rarely match the final invoice. Our order tests of Quickassignment found that base assignment rates were advertised as competitive, yet extras like formatting, revisions, Turnitin reports, and native UK writer upgrades pushed totals well above the quoted starting price. In a market where UK assignment quality is the differentiator, Quickassignment appeared expensive relative to the output delivered, and several order confirmations contained currency conversion quirks that added an additional margin.
Writer proficiency is the single biggest signal of a trustworthy assignment service, and on this measure Quickassignment underperforms. Our test orders at Quickassignment came back with sentence structure, article use, and idiom that strongly suggest non-native English writers worked on them. For assignment marked by UK academics, that mismatch is immediately obvious  markers comment on unnatural phrasing, awkward paragraph transitions, and vocabulary that is technically correct but stylistically foreign. UK degree-awarding institutions expect writing that reads as British academic English, and Quickassignment repeatedly failed that bar in our checks.
Based on the combined evidence of writing quality, pricing behaviour, writer proficiency, refund experience, and customer support, Quickassignment scores 1 out of 5 in our 2026 assessment. UK students researching a assignment service deserve options that deliver on time, without plagiarism, in correct British academic English  Quickassignment consistently failed one or more of those criteria in our testing. We cannot in good conscience recommend Quickassignment for any serious academic project where marks depend on the submitted work.
Across Reddit threads, Trustpilot reviews, and direct feedback we collected, students using Quickassignment for assignment work report the same recurring issues. The most common red flag is plagiarised content that triggers Turnitin alerts days before submission, leaving no time to rewrite. A second pattern is scope creep: Quickassignment delivers work that does not match the original brief, then demands additional payment to revise it. Deadline slippage on urgent orders, particularly weekend and same-day assignment turnarounds, appears in complaint after complaint about Quickassignment.
You should avoid Quickassignment entirely if you are submitting assignment work that will be put through Turnitin, iThenticate, or another plagiarism detection tool. The risk of triggering an academic misconduct investigation because of reused content is real and recurring with Quickassignment. You should also avoid Quickassignment if your deadline is firm: the service has a documented pattern of late delivery, and universities rarely accept "my writer was late" as a mitigating circumstance for a missed coursework submission.
Instead of Quickassignment, use one of the three UK writing services we trust for assignment work: Projects Deal, Easy Marks, or Top UK Writers. Each of these UK-based services delivers original work from verified writers, holds to agreed deadlines, and provides responsive support when issues arise  the three areas Quickassignment fails. Pricing is comparable to Quickassignment or slightly higher, but the writing quality is in a different league.
The table below compares Quickassignment against the three UK writing services we rank highest for academic writing work in 2026. Each service is scored on the criteria that matter most: writing quality, UK-native writers, plagiarism controls, deadline reliability, customer support, and refund honesty. Quickassignment underperforms across every measure.
| Criterion | Quickassignment | Projects Deal | Easy Marks | Top UK Writers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Writing Quality | Poor | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good |
| UK-Native Writers | Rare | Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Plagiarism-Free | Unreliable | Guaranteed | Guaranteed | Guaranteed |
| On-Time Delivery | Inconsistent | 99% | 98% | 97% |
| Customer Support | Slow | 24/7 UK | 24/7 UK | UK Hours |
| Refund Honesty | Difficult | Clear Policy | Clear Policy | Clear Policy |
| Overall Rating | 1 / 5 | 5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
Ready to choose a service that actually delivers? Visit Projects Deal for dissertation and thesis work, Easy Marks for fast essay turnaround, or Top UK Writers for general UK coursework. All three outperform Quickassignment on every measure that matters.
Looking for a reliable UK alternative to Quickassignment? Our editors recommend these three verified UK writing services instead:
Each is verified for UK-native writers, original work, and on-time delivery — the checks that Quickassignment repeatedly failed in our 2026 audit.
The Quickassignment price list headlines a competitive rate within range of UK student budgets, but our 2026 order tests at Quickassignment revealed the final invoice rarely tracks the advertised figure. Quickassignment charges add-ons at checkout that do not appear on the main pricing page: urgency upgrades, native-writer upgrades, formatting surcharges, Turnitin report access, and a non-optional order-management fee. Those line items stack to inflate the Quickassignment base price by 40 to 60 percent.
Quickassignment currency conversion is the second pricing concern. UK students paying Quickassignment in GBP were shown one rate at checkout and a different rate on the card statement. The spread benefits Quickassignment payment processor and widens the effective cost to the student by another 3 to 5 percent. When we challenged Quickassignment support on the discrepancy, the response from Quickassignment was that the rate shown at checkout was indicative only, not binding.
Our cost test at Quickassignment priced a 6,000-word master-level dissertation chapter with 7-day turnaround, standard writer tier, and Turnitin report. The advertised total at Quickassignment was 145 pounds. The invoice delivered at Quickassignment checkout was 207 pounds. That is a 43-percent premium over the advertised figure and places Quickassignment in the expensive tier of the UK writing-services market without offering the UK-native writer pool that would justify the premium.
For a UK master dissertation at 15,000 words, Quickassignment fully-loaded price exceeds the budget a typical UK student can justify relative to the risk Quickassignment carries on writing quality and refund honesty. Each of the three UK-vetted alternatives published on this page returns an invoice that is both lower than the Quickassignment checkout total and supported by bundled quality features that Quickassignment charges extra for.
The order journey at Quickassignment begins with a promising landing page. Quickassignment homepage advertises UK writers, Turnitin reports, and money-back guarantees. The gap between what Quickassignment promises and what Quickassignment delivers is where most complaints originate. We walked through the full Quickassignment order flow five times in 2026.
Quote stage at Quickassignment: the headline rate is generous but the calculator adds line items the homepage does not preview. Urgency surcharges, writer tier upgrades, formatting fees, and plagiarism report charges stack silently. A typical UK master-level 6,000-word order at Quickassignment moves from 145 pounds to 200+ pounds. Students commit to Quickassignment expecting one price and pay another.
Writer assignment at Quickassignment: opaque. The Quickassignment platform displays a writer ID rather than credentials. Requests to Quickassignment support for writer qualifications returned confidentiality responses. When we asked Quickassignment to assign a UK-based writer specifically, the confirmation email said matching in progress but the draft arrived with non-UK markers.
Draft delivery at Quickassignment: on-time rate of 3 out of 5. Late Quickassignment orders arrived without proactive communication from Quickassignment. The 2 late Quickassignment orders arrived 6 and 18 hours past the agreed time.
Revision cycle at Quickassignment: formally unlimited, practically constrained. Quickassignment agents routed revision requests back to the original writer, reproducing the original errors. Requesting a different writer at Quickassignment triggered a re-assignment fee not disclosed at purchase.
When a complaint cannot be resolved by the first-line Quickassignment agent, escalation is required. Our Quickassignment escalation attempts took 48 to 96 hours to reach a supervisor, and the supervisor response typically restated the original agent decision. Quickassignment does not publish a formal complaints process, which matters under UK consumer protection and dispute-resolution expectations.
This review of Quickassignment follows the UKRankings testing rubric — pricing transparency, originality, deadline reliability, customer support, refund policy, and confidentiality. The full methodology and how reviewers are scored is at How We Test. To request a re-test or report an experience, contact editorial@ukrankings.co.uk.
UKRankings shares ownership with Projectsdeal.co.uk, EasyMarks.co.uk, and TopUKWriters.co.uk. Reviews of those three providers are scored using the same rubric applied to Quickassignment. Editorial scoring is run by reviewers separated from the commercial team. Editorial policy.
comments